| Author |
Message |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 8190
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How do you act before the SB? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| IABoomer wrote: |
| How do you act before the SB? |
That is weird. I re-looked at the hand and SB is actually on BTN. It's Leggo Poker that screwed this. I tried it again with the same results. We were 9 players with 3 sitting out. Maybe that's why. Anyway, I changed it manually. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IABoomer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 8190
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That hand looks pretty standard. I might consider not leading at the flop since your chances of pushing anyone off their draw are slim and leading only builds the pot and gives them better odds to chase. Plus, they did open-raise and call your three-bet, so they should have something better than 72o and you could be behind with your AKo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WhatASurprise Message Board Junkie
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 2071 Location: You come at the king, you best not miss.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don`t donk the flop. Otherwise, standard.
EV stands for Expected Value. It is a measurement for how much money you will win/lose on a given action over the long term. If the action taken is profitable, it is +EV, and if it is unprofitable, it is -EV.
Calculating EV can be done in several ways, depending on the situation. It is rather complicated, and you will not find it as valuable in limit as in NL. That is because you will have to count in bet sizes and implied odds to a higher degree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WhatASurprise wrote: |
Don`t donk the flop. Otherwise, standard.
EV stands for Expected Value. It is a measurement for how much money you will win/lose on a given action over the long term. If the action taken is profitable, it is +EV, and if it is unprofitable, it is -EV.
Calculating EV can be done in several ways, depending on the situation. It is rather complicated, and you will not find it as valuable in limit as in NL. That is because you will have to count in bet sizes and implied odds to a higher degree. |
The flop donking? I realized it when posting the hand. I a live hand, I don't have the reflexes to count outs and figure those things. That's why I do it after with a pen a paper. After a while, I should be able to do it instantly.
As for +EV, I looked on the internet. They have tables for this but basically, it's the preflop hands that are profitable. And if I translate this into beginner's language, those preflop hands they tell you to play in books. Well, I am sticking to this. But I am definitely lacking concentration one the cards hit the board. There is a lot of stuff to take into consideration but I am getting there.
Thanks
Last edited by nienie23 on Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
suicideblonde1 Banned
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 1975 Location: an animal trapped in a hot car
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I apologise for the tone of my replies. I was tipsy and thought you were claiming to be a "math genius". Your posts are good, you're actually trying to get better. Sorry  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| suicideblonde1 wrote: |
I apologise for the tone of my replies. I was tipsy and thought you were claiming to be a "math genius". Your posts are good, you're actually trying to get better. Sorry  |
Apologies accepted my dear but you look very mean on that picture.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pil Sung Straight Flush
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 393 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:09 pm Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
| suicideblonde1 wrote: |
| nienie23 wrote: |
| Know your opponents. If one very passive player raises preflop, he has AA, not AK, not KK. He has AA. |
I don't play LHE, but a lot of what you say is clearly extremely stupid. This quote I've picked out is absolutely mind-blowingly dumb, but there are plenty of other examples. |
You read further than I did. I stopped at
| Quote: |
| HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
| Pil Sung wrote: |
You read further than I did. I stopped at
| Quote: |
| HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. |
|
Sigh!!!!! You should have read a little bit more, i.e. her last comment on this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SmellsLikeDonk Royal Flush
Joined: 12 Jan 2009 Posts: 599 Location: Shoving where it's +EV
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nienie23 wrote: |
As for +EV, I looked on the internet. They have tables for this but basically, it's the preflop hands that are profitable. And if I translate this into beginner's language, those preflop hands they tell you to play in books. Well, I am sticking to this. But I am definitely lacking concentration one the cards hit the board. There is a lot of stuff to take into consideration but I am getting there.
Thanks |
Check out the table for odds given X number of outs at this web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poker_probability_(Texas_hold_%27em)#After_the_flop
(you will have to copy and paste as the direct link does not work)
When I started playing I referenced this table all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrounds High Card
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Your analysis on 2 doesn't add up to me, though I only post to give the experts a chance to pick me apart.
"HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. He was never dominated. He was just going for a flush and with 2 of his suit on the flop, he is there till river and will even bet it if he missed it, just in case. "
He was going for a draw but you gave him good pot odds to call.
So at the turn 2.60 was in so that means he needed 50 cents to call on the flop. .50/2.60 approximately 1/5 or 20%. He makes that flush more than 20% of the time, so he did the correct thing by calling if he didn't believe you were also trying to make it. You made a betting error by giving a flush draw a free river card after that. So even though we didn't factor in implied pot odds, it turned out we didn't need to because you were being soft on draws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nienie23 Full House
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 164 Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jrounds wrote: |
He was going for a draw but you gave him good pot odds to call.
So at the turn 2.60 was in so that means he needed 50 cents to call on the flop. .50/2.60 approximately 1/5 or 20%. He makes that flush more than 20% of the time, so he did the correct thing by calling if he didn't believe you were also trying to make it. You made a betting error by giving a flush draw a free river card after that. So even though we didn't factor in implied pot odds, it turned out we didn't need to because you were being soft on draws. |
You are absolutely right. I posted this 2 months ago. IABoomer got it all right. He explained what "dominated" meant, and also the effect of buying a free card. My opponent played his hand the right way. His raise on the flop just freaked me out and made me back off.
The beauty of this forum is that there is always someone ready to give advices. Now, I can spot someone trying to buy a free card and I love to do it myself and seeing opponents go into the check-call mode. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DforDissent Message Board Junkie
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 1251 Location: testing my theory that my "best game to 100% focus on" is HORSE mtts
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:19 am Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
OP, you are correct that it seems lotsa folks play shorthanded limit as if they have never been exposed to the concept of "+EV hands".
But also keep in mind that with LIMIT holdem, when 6handed or less, often it isn't about the inherent hand strength, it's about POSITION, and the weakness/trickyness/readability of your opponents. I often see shorthanded LHE players who seem to consistently win and yet preflop they rarely fold -- almost always raising (or 3bet/cap!) -- but upon closer analysis I think most of these apparent-maniacs are just really good post-flop. They shut down quickly before investing too much if they have air and their opponent is "honest" and has just raised or check-raised them (for example).
So really, the problem is that the "win rate" of a hand is based on "all-in preflop" matchups, but since in LHE often the "-EV" hands are folded on a missed flop, they aren't quite so negative EV. ALSO those same bottom-rung hands have quite good implied odds due to their deceptive nature (i.e. J6o, flop comes JT6 and the preflop raiser with AJ or KJ fires the flop and the turn, and probably the river too thus allowing the guy with J6o to raise/chkraise somewhere along the way for mega-payoff).
Not saying "any two can win", but it seems like that is the case with these kind of maniacs -- short-term anyway (until the table figures out just how loose the maniac actually is, and notices the "honesty" of their post-flop play ... often the maniac will just LEAVE the table when it's clear the table is calling them down light and/or trapping thus reducing the risk/reward ratio too much). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjc16_1 High Card
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:38 pm Post subject: Re: Poker Math Wizz VS No folding players. LHE 0.25/0.50 |
|
|
| nienie23 wrote: |
I have seen a lot of threads and answers on this forum where players seem to use nothing but math to make decisions. Although I a a firm believer that Math is one of the most important tool to be a winning player, it should not be a goal in itself. One must adapt his (her) play according to the opponents. To these nofloders, preflop is not even part of the hand. It's nothing more than fixing the price to enter the hand, i.e. if they were bound to play that 9-3s, they will play it even if it means calling 3 bets. For them, the real hand starts with the flop. Then they adjust to what they hold and/or chase till river.
------------------
HAND #1 A specialist in card chasing. Don't tell him he should have folded preflop, then on the flop will all the mathematical explanations. He'll just answer: yeah, but I won and you lost.
------------------
Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 Limit Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
Pre-Flop: T 7 dealt to Hero (BB)
6 folds, BTN raises, SB calls, Hero folds
Flop: ($1.25) 3 8 2 (2 Players)
SB checks, BTN bets, SB calls
Turn: ($1.75) 7 (2 Players)
SB checks, BTN bets, SB raises, BTN 3-bets, SB calls
River: ($4.75) A (2 Players)
SB checks, BTN checks
Results: $4.75 Pot ($0.20 Rake)
BTN showed 8 K (a pair of Eights) and LOST (-$2.25 NET)
SB showed 7 A (two pair, Aces and Sevens) and WON $4.55 (+$2.30 NET)
------------------
HAND #2 Any Mathwizz can explain to my opponent that he was dominated after my preflop raise? In order to be dominated, you have to know what it means. He was never dominated. He was just going for a flush and with 2 of his suit on the flop, he is there till river and will even bet it if he missed it, just in case.
-----------------
Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 Limit Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
Pre-Flop: A J dealt to Hero (UTG+1)
UTG folds, Hero raises, 3 folds, CO calls, 2 folds, BB calls
Flop: ($1.60) 3 6 K (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets, CO raises, BB folds, Hero calls
Turn: ($2.60) K (2 Players)
Hero checks, CO checks
River: ($2.60) 4 (2 Players)
Hero checks, CO bets, Hero calls
Results: $3.60 Pot ($0.15 Rake)
Hero mucked A J (a pair of Kings) and LOST (-$1.50 NET)
CO showed T 9 (a flush, Ten high) and WON $3.45 (+$1.95 NET)
------------------
HAND #3 Here, go tell CO that he really was dominated. Told you, preflop is just fixing a price. He was bound to play anyway and then... flopped the flush. BB was ok to call my raise but did not have pot odds to see the turn and the river. Pot what? said he. And then added "I am here to play and have fun".
------------------
Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 Limit Hold'em Cash Game, 7 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
Pre-Flop: Q Q dealt to Hero (UTG+1)
UTG folds, Hero raises, MP folds, CO calls, BTN folds, SB calls, BB calls
Flop: ($2) 4 8 2 (4 Players)
SB checks, BB bets, Hero raises, CO calls, SB folds, BB calls
Turn: ($3.50) 5 (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero checks, CO bets, BB calls, Hero calls
River: ($5) A (3 Players)
BB checks, Hero checks, CO bets, BB calls, Hero folds
Results: $6 Pot ($0.30 Rake)
CO showed 9 3 (a flush, Nine high) and WON $5.70 (+$3.70 NET)
BB mucked 5 5 (three of a kind, Fives) and LOST (-$2 NET)
So to all fo us, players who want to learn and be the best, learn your math but don't swear by it. Know your opponents. If one very passive player raises preflop, he has AA, not AK, not KK. He has AA. If a usual limper starts raising everything that moves postflop, he has flopped a set. If another one keeps check calling you, he is chasing. The board will tell you if it's a flush or a straight. If there is no threath on the board, beware on the damn Ace on the river, it's always there.
In "Small Stakes Hold'em, winning big with expert play", the author suggets two preflop plays. The one for loose tables (6 players or more who will see the flop) works better for me when the VPIP of a table is more than 35%. But that alone won't make it. His "evaluating the flop part" is one of the most valuable poker lesson I have read. And it takes time to grasp. I am far from a winning player but for once I can defend myself at my limit. |
Poker is very much a game of probabilities and math -- much more so than probably any other game I can think of. Because, on average, everyone is dealt the same cards, the ONLY way to make money in the long run is to bet when you have the best chance of winning the hand. The "intuitive" players might be able to win or break even for a while (especially in a game like PLO or NLHE where there is much more bluffing involved) but they tend to lose money over time. Having said that . . .
Hand#1 -- Poor (but not terrible) play from the A-7. The flop looks very innocuous, so I don't think he minded calling 1 bet with his A high here, b/c it's likely to be good.
On the turn, he hit 2nd pair -- again on a board where his hand is very likely to be good, considering the preflop action.
On the river: he hit his 3 outer -- what can I say?
I would comment on other hands, but I'm tired.
Summary: Learn to use math if you want to win at poker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB Copyright 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|