| Agree? |
| Yes |
|
23% |
[ 3 ] |
| No |
|
76% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 13 |
|
| Author |
Message |
qwertykerr High Card
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:38 pm Post subject: Interesting SIte |
|
|
| In the tournements I've played the guy with the least money loses the all-in 9 out of ten times. Often ahead in the hand, yet loses. Very interesting! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UrbanMeyer1 Royal Flush
Joined: 25 Jun 2005 Posts: 720 Location: Gainesville, FL (The Swamp)
|
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
krutguy Full House
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:21 pm Post subject: Re: Interesting SIte |
|
|
| qwertykerr wrote: |
| In the tournements I've played the guy with the least money loses the all-in 9 out of ten times. Often ahead in the hand, yet loses. Very interesting! |
It happens, the site isnt rigged dude |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
krutguy Full House
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:21 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
| UrbanMeyer1 wrote: |
lol... True the site is rigged, I totally agree |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
krutguy Full House
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why did you right that urban? lol joking joking |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thejackbull7 High Card
Joined: 31 Jul 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:13 pm Post subject: ridiculous beats FULL TILT |
|
|
| i look and read what people are saying about bad players and beats being part of the game-i agree that sometimes you may have a more inexperinced or loose player getting a few chips here and there but people the fact is that you cant survive a 2500 person tourney and take 5 bad beats nevermind taking 5 bad beats every single 18 person tourney-if you read differently theyre playing high stakes and not 10-100 dollar tourneys or thay work for the site-full tilt stands by the integrity-lol-ill tell you what put some pros into the average tourney and they wont come close to the money 9 out of 10 times-fact of the matter is this if the pros took beats like the average joe does in these tourneys they would find a new line of work-lets face it people-when youre a 4-1 favorite and you lose 9 out of 10 of those hands (all ins of course) somethings wrong in pokerville- name is ironic FULL TILT by the way look at the site ratings and see why this one ranks where it does-hmmmm? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GTKID Four of a Kind
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 305 Location: Waxahachie, Tx
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You are wildly saying 9 out of 10 times. These things happen in live play. They are the nature of poker. You have no proof or statistics. This is just how you feel. It helps that you forget the times you win. I have actually played here enough and I don't feel the that it is "rigged". I have put in a ton of hands and done well in many tournaments. You are either just running in a bad streak due to variance, or you are a bad player looking for an excuse. Either way the site is not rigged and you are jumping to conclusions because you lost. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JS13_TPS Straight Flush
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 445 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| maybe quit pushing all in so often? Just a thought. LOL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
goodtime Banned
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2043 Location: Dearborn Hts, MI
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lol, Fish again blaming there losses on the site being "Rigged."
That cracks me up. At least this thread was good for a laugh I guess |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GTKID Four of a Kind
Joined: 21 Jul 2005 Posts: 305 Location: Waxahachie, Tx
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have put in many hands in tournaments on Full Tilt. And times I even have the worst of it and win as the shorstack. Over a long period of time I have never once felt it was rigged, or that small stacks where being punished. You are speaking from an extremely limited sample size, and you are conveniently forgetting the times small stacks win, so you can help support your 9/10 claim that has no basis.
Oh great great first post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valeo Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have played a lot on this site and I feel that it is not rigged but sometimes I wonder if the cards are totally "random". lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaconda78 Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 4179
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would like, just once, to see somebody support one of these conspiracy theories with actual statistics. Not just saying 9/10 times, but show at least 1000 hand histories/analises (spelling?). Show some proof, don't just pick a number that sounds good, like 9/10. PROOF IS KING!!! Also, please stop making these threads - there's far too many of them as it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
goodtime Banned
Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 2043 Location: Dearborn Hts, MI
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| again all I can say is... LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaconda78 Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 4179
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| And another thing: of course the all-in tends to lose. By the time a short stack has to go all in, they're usually getting desperate, playing hands that they normally would not play as strongly as they need to when they have <10 BB left. They have to go all in with hands that normally they'd make a small raise (or even limp) with and often fold on the flop. That's why being short-stacked is a disadvantage - you tend to lose! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zuchov Royal Flush
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 646
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention that there's usually a reason this person has so few chips in the first place.... maybe it's because they suck, and that's why lose.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|