Online Poker Forum - The Real Story of the WSOPC at Tahoe

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker News
Author Message
JDN
Team Full Tilt


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:50 pm    Post subject: The Real Story of the WSOPC at Tahoe Reply with quote

The hour long program on ESPN doesn't do justice to Ivey's play at the final table. The problem with an hour long show is that it only shows the bust out and the all in hands and with 10 players at a table, it is impossible to get any other coverage crammed into 60 minutes.

It was basically a dominating performance from Phil. The actual final table lasted over 14 hours and the heads portion was about 2 1/2 hours long. Phil kept the pressure on all the players throughout the final table and was able to build his stack from blind stealing more than anything. He played around 75% of the hands, similar to what he did when he won the Omaha bracelet this year at the Series. Actually I think he played every hand at the Omaha final table.

No credit was given to James Van Alstyne for playing from the short stack most of the day to finish 3rd. Lisandro made a great come back to win the tournament but was playing scared for most of the heads up play. The only reason he called the final hand was because Phil had made the same move on him several times.

Phil had doubled Lisandro up 2 or 3 times during heads up only to whittle his chips away several times before doubling up twice in a few hands. It is unfortunate that none of this information was conveyed during the show. It seems like the network only thinks people want to see the big hands that make or break the players. What if baseball broadcasts only showed homeruns? It might make baseball a little more interesting to watch but there is so much more that goes on during a game, in sports and poker, that help determine the outcome.

Hopefully they can move to a 2 hour format in the future and give a more accurate portrayal of these final tables.
Back to top
dano2769
Flush


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Madison, WI/Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 3:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I absolutely agree. I've always thought that the editing of poker tables down to the exciting hands takes away from the realism of the game.
Back to top
Jaconda78
Moderator


Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 4179

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And worse, they splice things people said and did in one hand into another! Does anybody know when/if any more live broadcasts will be shown? Even reruns of those would be nice - I want to actually watch how the pros play, not how they play once every 221 hands when they have pocket aces.
Back to top
n0rd1c
Three of a Kind


Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jaconda, i totally agree. it was nice seeing the pros ditch every hand for 10 min and not being able to do the math for the sidepots just like in everyones own home games. just made em more real.
Back to top
JetsFan28
Royal Flush


Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 799
Location: NY

PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont like editing of poker sessions, but the broadcast would drag on 4ever
Back to top
3ILPG3
High Card


Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that the edited broadcasts would be a lot better if it weren't for the commentary. Honestly, most of the time I watch it on mute.
Back to top
BOYNAMEDSUE
Moderator


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 9542
Location: Mypos

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like watching the first couple days of the WSOP more than the last couple days for that very reason. Less all-ins, more table talk, and more actual poker being played.

And I absolutely disagree with 3ILPG3. Lon McEachern and Norman Chad do a great job. But that's just my opinion. I'm probably outnumbered, lol.
Back to top
mistaken69
Banned


Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 1699
Location: taking up smoking

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i cant stand mike sexton.....as a commentator that is. I find him to be soo...fake.
Back to top
goomlah
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 1295
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:31 pm    Post subject: Fake? Reply with quote

How does someone find a poker pro's commentary to be fake? I will always understand the critcism with Norman Chad cause frankly, he ain't a poker guy. I will never understand someone ripping on Mike Sexton, a season pro with years of experience. Now we all know he's not a top pro, but we definitely now he is capable of playing with the best players in the world. So when he says something, take the advice.
Back to top
rentuhbat
High Card


Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ithink Lon McEachern and Norman Chad kickass.
i would like to see more of these big tourneys
they should put out dvds or something, of the whole final table of different tournements...uncut and what not.
Back to top
Honest_Rob



Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 8614
Location: I neither know nor think that I know. (drinking myself stupid obv)

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:10 pm    Post subject: Re: The Real Story of the WSOPC at Tahoe Reply with quote

JDN wrote:
The hour long program on ESPN doesn't do justice to Ivey's play at the final table. The problem with an hour long show is that it only shows the bust out and the all in hands and with 10 players at a table, it is impossible to get any other coverage crammed into 60 minutes.

It was basically a dominating performance from Phil. The actual final table lasted over 14 hours and the heads portion was about 2 1/2 hours long. Phil kept the pressure on all the players throughout the final table and was able to build his stack from blind stealing more than anything. He played around 75% of the hands, similar to what he did when he won the Omaha bracelet this year at the Series. Actually I think he played every hand at the Omaha final table.

No credit was given to James Van Alstyne for playing from the short stack most of the day to finish 3rd. Lisandro made a great come back to win the tournament but was playing scared for most of the heads up play. The only reason he called the final hand was because Phil had made the same move on him several times.

Phil had doubled Lisandro up 2 or 3 times during heads up only to whittle his chips away several times before doubling up twice in a few hands. It is unfortunate that none of this information was conveyed during the show. It seems like the network only thinks people want to see the big hands that make or break the players. What if baseball broadcasts only showed homeruns? It might make baseball a little more interesting to watch but there is so much more that goes on during a game, in sports and poker, that help determine the outcome.

Hopefully they can move to a 2 hour format in the future and give a more accurate portrayal of these final tables.

I completely agree with you JDN. I wasn't there but there are little clues on the TV show that a close observer can catch. Like after the first hand they showed of Ivey doubling up Lisandro they went to a commercial. When they came back from the commercial Ivey instantly had all those chips back. It's safe to assume that like you said he whittled them away in the hands they didn't show. And then the announcers say Ivey must be tired if he's calling here and everyone instantly takes it as the truth like Ivey just said I'm tired so I'm going to make a bad call. Ivey never said he was tired and never said it was a bad play. So much info is missing that the situation is hard to judge. I've heard people say that they don't think Ivey is a top player anymore because of that tournament and I always tell them they are crazy and ESPN doesn't show the whole thing. Thanks for the info.
Back to top
fajackta
High Card


Joined: 25 Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Nor Cal

PostPosted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was also wandering, when they do the editing. Are the announcers actually doing the announcing at the time or are the actually announcing to the edited version?? Just curious.
Back to top
3ILPG3
High Card


Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

they are not allowed to see what cards the players have while the tournament is going on. so they have to go back later and do voice overs.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Poker News All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Powered by phpBB Copyright 2001, 2005 phpBB Group