Online Poker Forum - ITM fifty-fifty, shortstacked

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Multi-Table Tournament Poker
Author Message
tracysanders
I EAT MTTs


Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Posts: 8599
Location: ANOTHER FUQQUIN MINCASH

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:46 am    Post subject: ITM fifty-fifty, shortstacked Reply with quote

UTG+1 was fairly solid, he had however shown his ability to fold to reshoves and 3bets preflop on numerous occasions.

CO was a complete idiot as you should be able to tell by his flat-call, he had limp/called into probably 40% of flops with mediocre hands and had an uncanny ability to outflop people most of the time.

Button was Stuart Paterson, an ftp red pro- this in itself should demand respect but I was not overly impressed with what I had seen from him since being moved to his table. He seemed to have no concept of position, and would call down anything with top pair regardless of his kicker he had previously spewed off 90% of his stack to me (before chipping back up obv) with K7 on a K23QA board after I had flopped a set of 2s. The only reason he was still there is I tried to let him reshove me on the river because I thought the A would have hit his range hard, so I made a half pot river bet which he flatted much to my chagrin.

I was planning on reshoving over UTG+1 and CO here, when stuart made his move- with 5M do I have the stack to let this go and wait, or should I assume Stuart is squeezing light with almost ATC and call it hoping to have him dominated or flipping for my double up?

Full Tilt Poker, NL Hold'em Tournament, 600/1,200 Blinds, 150 Ante, 8 Players
-

MP1: 36,086
MP2: 30,206
CO: 50,870
BTN: 28,276
SB: 38,400
Hero (BB): 15,343
UTG: 29,670
UTG+1: 17,914

Pre-Flop: (3,000) 9Club 9Heart dealt to Hero (BB)
UTG folds, UTG+1 raises to 2,899, MP1 folds, CO calls 2,899, BTN raises to 28,126 and is All-In, 2 folds, Hero ???????
Back to top
lovebeefstew
Also likes tacos


Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 6751
Location: No income tax no VAT....

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patterson never has ATC. But I assume he can definately be squeezing light. With your stack, I call and hope to flip against Patterson.
Back to top
bigpairde
Moderator


Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Posts: 10100
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i fold. my concern isnt BTN, but that i am very likely to have to show down my 99 in a multiway pot, so not good flipping, (since this will be a juicy call for utg+1 and co)
and as much as i hate to say this, but imo there are better spots we can wait for
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 1885
Location: California

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I think I'm calling here albeit not ecstatic about it because your M is getting dangerously low. You're already ITM, so it's time to gambol. And there's a load of dead money in the pot. If Stuart has a big pair, you almost hope that UTG+1 has a big pair too because you're going to need to spike your nine anyway... how sweet it would be to triple up.

If you fold this hand to wait for a better spot... you may very well have to wait one or two more orbits for a nice hand... and even then if you double up, you're probably going to be near 20k (only slightly more than what you have now).
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 1885
Location: California

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bigpairde wrote:
i fold. my concern isnt BTN, but that i am very likely to have to show down my 99 in a multiway pot, so not good flipping, (since this will be a juicy call for utg+1 and co)
and as much as i hate to say this, but imo there are better spots we can wait for


I can't see the CO calling unless he was playing a monster very sneakily... Jeff said he was playing mediocre hands and he has to risk half his stack here. I'd say he's folding about 80% of the time.

I think if this becomes a 3-way all-in, there's a reasonable chance that we're up against two big aces.
Back to top
dcdoorknob
Twist and Shout


Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 2906
Location: Mississippi

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like a call here. From the descriptions I can't be convinced that any of their ranges have us beat. Sounds like a great time to go big or go home.

Last edited by dcdoorknob on Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 1885
Location: California

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question for tracy and big... do you snap call with JJ here? Certainly QQ, right?
Back to top
adam27x
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Posts: 4984
Location: New York/New Jersey

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dcdoorknob wrote:
I like a call here. From the descriptions I can't be convinced that any of their ranges have us beat. Sounds like a great time to go big or go home.


UTG+1's range is pretty solid, imo. With his stack he shouldn't be opening too wide at all, and he opened in EP. Also, if stuart is spewing K7 like that and if he doesn't seem to understand position I don't think he can really understand the concept of a squeeze so I think his range will be stronger than what everyone else thinks.

I think I very grumpily fold.
Back to top
JDizzzle72
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 5117

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I call here pretty quickly and am happy about it. Very easy spot to squeeze light from button (which isn't a high level concept whatsoever) and 99 is definitely ahead of that range. UTG+1 is likely not good at all, but I see stack sizes like that r/f a lot even though they obviously shouldn't. He has to have an absolutely premium hand to call a squeeze and a caller. We're greatly ahead of their ranges. CO is negligible if he's bad. If he's good this is a fold. Flatting to induce a squeeze and planning on calling is a great play from his spot with stack sizes behind, but he probably isn't that good.
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 1885
Location: California

PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete D wrote:
Question for tracy and big... do you snap call with JJ here? Certainly QQ, right?


adam27x wrote:
I think I very grumpily fold.


Adam- Same question for you... what pocket pair are you calling with?
Back to top
Pete D
Pistol Pete


Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 1885
Location: California

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tracy- Did you fold this hand? If so, what pocket pair are you calling with?... I'm curious because we're obviously afraid of running into a monster (AA-QQ), which makes me think that 99 & JJ are essentially the same hand in this spot.

And with an M of 5, folding JJ doesn't seem like a good option.

Agree? Disagree?
Back to top
tracysanders
I EAT MTTs


Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Posts: 8599
Location: ANOTHER FUQQUIN MINCASH

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete D wrote:
Tracy- Did you fold this hand? If so, what pocket pair are you calling with?... I'm curious because we're obviously afraid of running into a monster (AA-QQ), which makes me think that 99 & JJ are essentially the same hand in this spot.

And with an M of 5, folding JJ doesn't seem like a good option.

Agree? Disagree?


Pete, after debating long and hard I called the shove- I honestly contemplated the fold here though, as I think it was a bad spot, turned out stuart squeezed with QQ and held up.

After discussing with several friends, and a banned bad little birdie- they seem to think 55+ is worth a call due to the fact that as you said if they have a monster we are going for a set whether we have 55 or JJ. We are flipping against enough hands here, or dominating the A2-A5 squeeze range to make it worth the pot in their opinion. IDK though 55 seems a bit low for me, I would like to have more of the Ax covered than that--- but their reasoning for calling the shove here does seem indeed sound with 99.
Back to top
stlbirds13
Straight Flush


Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 422
Location: on the wrong side of the coin

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, I think you have to call and hope for a flip. I also agree with your assesment that I probably fold >55 also, he may be squeezing with aX i.e a-7, if that is the case you are in a great spot. But if you call with 55, 44 etc. then at best you are looking at a flip and you could potentially be completely dominated. I'm guessing UTG +1 folded?
Back to top
adam27x
Message Board Junkie


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Posts: 4984
Location: New York/New Jersey

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete D wrote:
Pete D wrote:
Question for tracy and big... do you snap call with JJ here? Certainly QQ, right?


adam27x wrote:
I think I very grumpily fold.


Adam- Same question for you... what pocket pair are you calling with?


I definitely get it in with JJ+. TT is pretty close, it's really hard for me to say what I'd do there without knowing everything that I would if I were actually playing them.

I know squeezing isn't a high level concept at all (especially in tournaments), but you need to know position to really understand what a squeeze is so if he has no concept of position as tracy says, I don't really think he'll be squeezing wide. And if he was just spewing before and he actually does know what he is doing (I mean he is a red pro...he should at least know what position is, right?) he should know not to squeeze bluff vs tight EP ranges and shortstacks (that is, UTG+1).
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Online Poker Forum Home -> Multi-Table Tournament Poker All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Powered by phpBB Copyright 2001, 2005 phpBB Group