| Author |
Message |
rodelzki High Card
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:49 pm Post subject: Did I play my AA vs 78o well or was it because the SB had me covered? |
|
|
I have great respect for good Poker players and I don't know what to say about this fellow on the SB calling my ALL-IN. Perhaps he did not believe that I have the preflop nuts hand and when the board flopped a King as being the overcard and him hitting the second best card which is a 7 he courageously re-raised my 4,000 bet to 8,000 before I shoved all of my remaining chips. At the showdown I think he felt his dumbness when he saw my Aces. Unfortunately, it was a lucky catch for him with a "seven" on the river.
I don't feel too bad about it and I have accepted in my heart that POKER is really a game where everything goes.
Here's the hand history for your comment please.
Thanks
Full Tilt Poker Game #15751963012: $150 Railbirds.com Freeroll (114799510), Table 178 - 500/1000 Ante 125 - No Limit Hold'em - 16:53:39 ET - 2009/11/02
Seat 1: vivagalla (10,177)
Seat 2: Kukarinskii (56,796)
Seat 3: rodelzki (23,660)
Seat 4: tolgakaan1 (11,813)
Seat 5: DixikTR (55,253)
Seat 6: Sole Seeker (43,163)
Seat 7: pokergold1 (24,145)
Seat 9: XiMaker (54,732)
vivagalla antes 125
Kukarinskii antes 125
rodelzki antes 125
tolgakaan1 antes 125
DixikTR antes 125
Sole Seeker antes 125
pokergold1 antes 125
XiMaker antes 125
Kukarinskii posts the small blind of 500
rodelzki posts the big blind of 1,000
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to rodelzki [As Ac]
tolgakaan1 folds
DixikTR folds
Sole Seeker folds
pokergold1 folds
XiMaker folds
vivagalla folds
Kukarinskii calls 500
rodelzki raises to 2,000
Kukarinskii calls 1,000
*** FLOP *** [7d Kc 5d]
Kukarinskii checks
rodelzki bets 4,000
Kukarinskii raises to 8,000
rodelzki raises to 21,535, and is all in
Kukarinskii calls 13,535
rodelzki shows [As Ac]
Kukarinskii shows [7h 8c]
*** TURN *** [7d Kc 5d] [Ts]
*** RIVER *** [7d Kc 5d Ts] [7s]
rodelzki shows two pair, Aces and Sevens
Kukarinskii shows three of a kind, Sevens
Kukarinskii wins the pot (48,070) with three of a kind, Sevens
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 48,070 | Rake 0
Board: [7d Kc 5d Ts 7s]
Seat 1: vivagalla (button) folded before the Flop
Seat 2: Kukarinskii (small blind) showed [7h 8c] and won (48,070) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 3: rodelzki (big blind) showed [As Ac] and lost with two pair, Aces and Sevens
Seat 4: tolgakaan1 folded before the Flop
Seat 5: DixikTR folded before the Flop
Seat 6: Sole Seeker folded before the Flop
Seat 7: pokergold1 folded before the Flop
Seat 9: XiMaker folded before the Flop |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MattElsarelli Straight Flush
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 411
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You played it completely stadard. Just unlucky. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lurgertor Four of a Kind
Joined: 04 Jun 2008 Posts: 340 Location: Riskville
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| He actually played it pretty poorly, there's a really good argument for folding 87off pre from the SB, its definately not a great hand and you don't have a lot of chips to play with, so he's not getting great implied odds either. OTF if he's willing to call the allin, he might as well check shove, it might force out a pocket pair under the king or a better seven, and he'd still have decent equity against a flush draw which would shove or a king, which would at least call the min raise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubbies760 Drawing Dead
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 11115 Location: Depressed
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MattElsarelli wrote: |
| You played it completely standard. |
There's nothing standard about min-raising.
Postflop, obv there's nothing he could have done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MattElsarelli Straight Flush
Joined: 15 Aug 2009 Posts: 411
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cubbies760 wrote: |
| MattElsarelli wrote: |
| You played it completely standard. |
There's nothing standard about min-raising.
Postflop, obv there's nothing he could have done. |
Oh oops, I didnt see it was a min rasie. Casue this hand history makes my eyes bleed when I try to read it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rodelzki High Card
Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
appreciate your comment. It was just a lucky catch for him in the river. I think he was pot committed.
Thanks... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DforDissent Royal Flush
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 Posts: 669
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:30 pm Post subject: Re: Did I play my AA vs 78o well or was it because the SB had me covered? |
|
|
OP, it's simple. He flopped a pair, and still beating AQo. Also if you DO have AK well he's got 5 clean outs, twice. That's 10%+10% (it's not, but maybe he thinks it is) and especially if you have a good, unpaired Ace, he's loving your action.
Or maybe he had a bus to catch in 5 minutes, and wanted to double-up-or-go-home.
PS: my guess he woulda played it the same vs. DixikTR or Sole Seeker or XiMaker, considering the action on the flop... I mean his min-raise is basically saying "I want you to call" there's no way you would fold anything but complete air, and your over-shove says "I have at least top pair" :sigh: but you want players like this at your tournament table, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marsupial311 Royal Flush
Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Posts: 503
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The min raise is horrible. With antes in play you're giving him 4:1 on his call which is almost as good as the 5:1 odds he got for limping with his small blind.
If you want him to fold (you don't), you need to shove.
If you want him to stick around (you do), a standard 3xBB bet will give him the pot odds to call and build up a good pot.
Unlucky river, it happens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB Copyright 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|